Phillips

Phillips v. Reinhart

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20201:20-cv-01034California4,805 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MELCHESTER PHILLIPS, JR., Case No. 1:20-cv-01034-DAD-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMNEDING DISMISSING FIRST

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT

LEAVE TO AMEND

MICHAEL REINHART, et al., (ECF No. 7) Defendants.

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY

DAYS

17 Melchester Phillips, Jr. (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 31, 2020, Plaintiff’s complaint was screened and found not to state a cognizable claim. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff was provided with the legal standards that applied to his claims and was granted leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days. (Id.) Currently before the Court for screening is Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed August 24, 2020. (ECF No. 7.) I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT Notwithstanding any filing fee, the court shall dismiss a case if at any time the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.