King

(PC) Dalke v. King

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20201:20-cv-00534California477 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSHUA JASON DALKE, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00534-AWI-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN

CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

KING CLARK, et al., ) ) (ECF Nos. 24, 25) Defendants. ) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff Joshua Jason Dalke is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 34, 2020, the undersigned screened Plaintiff’s second amended complaint and found that Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim for deliberate indifference against Defendants Cordona, Algatar, Vera, Fugate and Romos. (ECF No. 24.) However, Plaintiff was advised that he failed to state any other cognizable claims. (Id.) Therefore, Plaintiff was advised that he could file an amended complaint or a notice of intent to proceed on the claims found to be cognizable. (Id.) On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.