Pringle

Pringle v. Cardall

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20202:18-cv-02035California2,648 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 PAMELA DENISE PRINGLE, No. 2:18-cv-2035 WBS KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER RE: CONDITIONAL SETTING

ASIDE OF ENTRY OF DEFAULT

BRENT CARDALL, COUNTY OF YOLO,

YOLO COUNTY PROBATION

DEPARTMENT, ANTHONY PENNELLA,

SANDY JONES, AMANDA GENTRY, NOEL

BARLOW-HUST, JUDY MESICK, CINDY McDONALD, MARK ALAN KUBINSKI, ELISA SUE MAGNUSON, JOHN DOES 1- 20, and JANE DOES 1-20, inclusive, Defendants. 21 ----oo0oo---- Defendant Anthony Pennella has filed an opposed motion to set aside the entry of default entered against him on November 27, 2018. (Mot. Set Aside Default (Docket No. 105).) I. Factual and Procedural Background Plaintiff Pamela Denise Pringle filed her First Amended Complaint on August 3, 2018, alleging violations by multiple California and Idaho defendants of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1985, violations of civil rights under the First,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.