Childres

(PC) Dustin v. Childres

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 20201:20-cv-00422California664 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 D. DUSTIN, No. 1:20-cv-00422-NONE-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DIRECTING

CHILDRES, et al., PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE $400.00 FILING

FEE IN FULL WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 2, 11, 14)

17 Plaintiff D. Dustin is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 11, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s in forma pauperis application (Doc. No. 2) be denied. (Doc. No. 11.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that objections were due within fourteen days. (Doc. No. 11.) On May 27, 2020, plaintiff filed a motion entitled notice of imminent danger, which the court construes as objections to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.