Satterfield

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JORGE FERNANDEZ, Case No. 1:19-cv-01220-DAD-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. TO DISMISS DEFENDANT AND CLAIMS

SATTERFIELD, et al., (Doc. 33)

Defendants. 14-DAY DEADLINE

16 On July 2, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint and found that it states cognizable claims of retaliation against Defendants Satterfield, Eslick, and Jackson in their individual capacities. (Doc. 32.) The Court found that the complaint’s claims against Defendant Salzer and its deliberate indifference, due process, and official-capacity claims were not cognizable. (Id.) The Court therefore directed Plaintiff, within 21 days, to file a second amended complaint curing the deficiencies in his pleading or to notify the Court that he wishes to proceed only on the claims found cognizable. (Id. 2, 9.) The Court cautioned Plaintiff that failure to comply with the order would result in a recommendation “that…