Moore

(PC) Huff v. Moore

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 20201:19-cv-01248California1,428 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JORDAN HUFF, Case No. 1:19-cv-01248-JDP

Plaintiff, SECOND SCREENING ORDER

v. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT DUE IN

THIRTY DAYS

THOMAS MOORE, et al., ECF No. 12 Defendants.

ORDER THAT THE CLERK’S OFFICE SEND

PLAINTIFF A NEW COMPLAINT FORM

Plaintiff Jordan Huff is a federal prisoner proceeding without counsel and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). On March 11, 2020, the previously assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s original complaint, finding that it was too brief and cursory to satisfy the pleading requirements of Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See ECF No. 6. The judge gave plaintiff the opportunity to submit an amended complaint, which plaintiff did on May 8, 2020. ECF No. 12. That amended complaint is now before the court for 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.