Dayson

(PC) Fratus v. Dayson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 20202:20-cv-00354California4,941 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN FRATUS, No. 2:20-cv-0354 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER DAYSON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that he was suffered side effects from psychiatric medication and was denied medical treatment. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 6), motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 8), motion to locate legal mail (ECF No. 9), motion for sanctions (ECF No. 10), and his complaint for screening (ECF No. 1). For the reasons set forth below, the court will deny the motions to proceed in forma pauperis, for extension of time, legal mail, and sanctions, and give plaintiff the opportunity to proceed with the complaint as screened or file an amended complaint. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has filed an in forma pauperis affidavit in which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.