(PC) Howell v. Do Canto
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAREEM J. HOWELL, 1:19-cv-00854-DAD-GSA-PC Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION
vs. PROCEED ONLY AGAINST
DEFENDANT M. DO CANTO FOR
DO CANTO, et al., RETALIATION UNDER THE FIRST
AMENDMENT, AND THAT ALL OTHER
Defendants. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE
DISMISSED
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 14 DAYS
17 18 Kareem J. Howell (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on June 19, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) The Complaint names as defendants Correctional Officer M. Do Canto, Sergeant M. Mason, and Lieutenant C. Munoz, and brings medical claims, retaliation claims, supervisory liability claims, state law claims, and a claim for submitting a false disciplinary report. The court screened the Complaint and found that it states a cognizable…