Perez

(PC) Sekona v. Perez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20201:19-cv-00400California3,847 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ETUATE SEKONA, 1:19-cv-00400-NONE-GSA-PC Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

v. CLAIM, WITH LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF No. 21.) R. PEREZ, et al.,

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE

Defendants. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT NOT

EXCEEDING 25 PAGES

16 I. BACKGROUND Etuate Sekona (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 28, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On May 13, 2020, the court dismissed the Complaint for failure to state a claim, with leave to amend. (ECF No. 15.) On August 31, 2020, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint which is now before the court for screening. 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 21.) II. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.