Koenig

(HC) Golden v. Koenig

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20201:18-cv-01003California1,643 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEROME GOLDEN, Case No. 1:18-cv-01003-DAD-JDP (HC) Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

GRANT RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO

v. DISMISS M. E. SPEARMAN, OBJECTIONS DUE IN THIRTY DAYS Respondent. ECF No. 14 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

SUBSTITUTE RESPONDENT

17 Petitioner Jerome Golden, a state prisoner without counsel, petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 10. Petitioner claims that the trial court erred when it: (1) denied his motion to suppress evidence allegedly obtained in violation of his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unlawful search and seizure and (2) failed to dismiss one of petitioner’s prior convictions under California’s three strikes law. Id. at 5, 10. Respondent moved to dismiss the petition. ECF No. 14. Petitioner has not opposed the motion, and the time to do so has passed. See Local Rule…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.