Casas

(PC) Rushdan v. Casas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20201:16-cv-00988California486 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SALADIN RUSHDAN aka 1:16-cv-00988-NONE-GSA-PC

ROBERT STANLEY WOODS,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION Plaintiff, FOR REIMBURSEMENT (ECF No. 79.) vs.

D. DAVEY, et al.,

15 Defendants. 16 17 I. BACKGROUND Saladan Rushdan aka Robert Stanley Woods (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint filed on March 9, 2018, against defendant Correctional Officer Casas (“Defendant”) for use of excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment and related state claims. (ECF No. 28.) On July 23, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for reimbursement of funds. (ECF No. 79.) On August 20, 2020, Defendant filed an opposition to the motion. (ECF No. 83.) II. MOTION FOR REIMBURSEMENT Plaintiff contends that he is entitled to attorney’s fees as reimbursement for his labor, postage, paper,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.