(PC) Slade v. Rio Cosumnes Correctional Center

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20202:20-cv-01346California448 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VERNON SLADE, No. 2:20-cv-1346-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

RIO COSUMNES CORRECTIONAL

CENTER,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 3, 2020, the court found that plaintiff had submitted a trust account 19 statement (ECF No. 6), but it has not been certified by a jail official, as required by 28 U.S.C. 20 § 1915(a)(2). ECF No. 7. 21 Accordingly, the court directed plaintiff to submit a certified trust account statement to 22 complete his request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Id. The court also warned plaintiff 23 that failure to do so would result in this action being dismissed. Id. The time for acting has now 24 passed and plaintiff has not submitted the certified trust account statement or otherwise responded 25 to the court’s order.1 26 1 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.