Kernan

(PC) Fields v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20202:18-cv-03130California340 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARLTON DWAYNE FIELDS, No. 2:18-cv-3130 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SCOTT KERNAN, Defendant. 16 By order issued April 27, 2020, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, and plaintiff was given sixty days leave to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 8). On July 1, 2020, plaintiff was granted an additional sixty days within which to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 18). Sixty days from that date have now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall randomly assign a District Court Judge to this action. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1); Fed. R.Civ. P. 41(b); Local…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.