Sanchez

Sanchez v. AMCO Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20201:19-cv-01633California3,448 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAMON SANCHEZ, No. 1:19-cv-01633-NONE-SKO Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO REMAND

AMCO INSURANCE COMPANY, and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, (Doc. No. 9) 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion to remand this action to state court. (Doc. No. 9.) On November 15, 2019, defendant AMCO removed this action from the Fresno County Superior Court where it was filed by plaintiff to this federal court based on diversity jurisdiction. (Doc. No. 1.) Plaintiff moves for remand contending that defendant’s removal of the action was not timely. (Doc. No. 9.) The court has considered the parties’ papers and finds it appropriate to rule on plaintiff’s motion without oral argument. See Local Rule 230(g). For the reasons set forth below, the court will deny plaintiff’s motion to remand. BACKGROUND In his complaint, plaintiff alleges as follows. Plaintiff was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.