Arnold

(PC) Taylor v. Arnold

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20202:17-cv-02014California360 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT LEE TAYLOR, No. 2:17-cv-2014 KJM CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ERIC ARNOLD, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 19, 2019, the magistrate judge assigned to this case filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.