(PC)Myers

(PC)Myers v. California Correctional Healthcare Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20202:20-cv-00561California2,035 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MICHAEL CRAIG MYERS, No. 2:20-cv-0561 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL

HEALTHCARE SERVICES,

14 Defendant.

16 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding pro se with an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges his rights were violated when a laptop that may have contained some of his personal information was stolen. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) and his complaint for screening (ECF No. 1). For the reasons set forth below the court will deny the motion to proceed in forma pauperis as moot and recommend that this action be dismissed. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (ECF No. 2.) However, because the court will recommend that this action be dismissed without prejudice the court will deny the motion to proceed in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.