CCWF

(PC) Flores v. CCWF

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20201:19-cv-01681California438 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ENID MARIE FLORES, 1:19-cv-01681-AWI-JDP

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND Plaintiff, RECOMMENDATIONS, ORDER DISMISSING CASE, and ORDER DENYING vs. PENDING MOTIONS AS MOOT 8 CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL (Doc. Nos. 14, 16, 18, 19, 21, 22, 25) WOMEN’S FACILITY, et al., Defendants.

12 Enid Marie Flores (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 13 with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 14 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 15 On June 12, 2020, the Magistrate Judge entered findings and recommendations, 16 recommending that this case be dismissed as frivolous because it is duplicative of another active 17 case. (Doc. No. 22.) On June 29, 2020, plaintiff filed objections. (Doc. No. 26.) 18 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 19 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.