Ward

(PC) Cantu v. Ward

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20201:20-cv-00386California2,174 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA JESSE CANTU, Case No. 1:20-cv-00386-JDP Plaintiff, SECOND SCREENING ORDER v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PLAINTIFF BE PERMITTED TO

JOHN DOE 1, et al., PROCEED ON COGNIZABLE CLAIMS AND

THAT NON-COGNIZABLE CLAIMS BE

Defendants. DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE ECF No. 7 OBJECTIONS DUE IN THIRTY DAYS ORDER THAT THE CLERK’S OFFICE

ASSIGN THIS CASE TO A DISTRICT

JUDGE 20 Plaintiff Joshua Jesse Cantu is a former state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this 21 civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 9, 2020, the court screened 22 plaintiff’s original complaint and found that it had stated cognizable Eighth Amendment claims 23 against some, but not all, defendants. ECF No. 5. The court gave plaintiff a choice between 24 (1) proceeding only on the claims found…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.