Sullivan

(HC) Flores v. Sullivan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20201:19-cv-01423California809 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALFREDO ANISETO FLORES, No. 1:19-cv-01423-NONE-EPG-HC Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING

v. PETITION, DENYING PETITIONER’S

MOTION TO STAY, DIRECTING THE

J. SULLIVAN, CLERK OF COURT TO ASSIGN DISTRICT

JUDGE AND CLOSE CASE, AND

Respondent. DECLINING TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

16 (Doc. Nos. 11, 20, 23) 17 18 Petitioner Alfredo A. Flores is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On April 8, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge recommended the respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cognizable federal habeas claim be granted. (Doc. No. 20.) The findings and recommendations were served on petitioner and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of that order. The court subsequently granted petitioner two extensions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.