Rodrigues

(PS) School v. Rodrigues

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20202:20-cv-00004California2,791 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL C. SCHOOL, No. 2:20-cv-0004-JAM-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER DEPUTY OLIVIA RODRIGUES,

DEPUTY RORY SONNIER, NEVADA

COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, Defendants. 17 Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. His declaration makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(1) and (2). See ECF No. 2. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Determining that plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis does not complete the required inquiry. Pursuant to § 1915(e)(2), the court must dismiss the case at any time if it determines that the allegation of poverty is untrue, or that the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against an immune defendant. As discussed below, plaintiff’s complaint must be dismissed for failure to state a claim.2 26 This case, in which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.