Gilliam

Gilliam v. O'Neill

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20201:19-cv-01711California1,079 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM JESSE GILLIAM, No. 1:19-cv-01711-DAD-SAB Plaintiff, v. ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE

TO RESPOND TO ORDER TO SHOW

BARBARA HOPE O’NEILL, et al., CAUSE, FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, AND

FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDERS

Defendants. 16 17 On August 20, 2020, the court directed plaintiff Williams Jesse Gilliam, who is proceeding pro se in this action, to show cause why this action should not be dismissed due to his failures to prosecute and obey court orders. (Doc. No. 34.) That order outlined plaintiff’s repeated failures to prosecute this action and obey court orders, which the court incorporates by reference here. (See id. at 1–4.) The order directed plaintiff to show cause in writing within fourteen (14) days of service of the order why this action should be dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action. Well over fourteen days have passed since the issuance of the August 20, 2020 order to show cause, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.