Restivo

(PC) Harris v. Restivo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20201:20-cv-00797California7,698 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEVONTE B. HARRIS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00797-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

v. RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION

PROCEED ON PLAINTIFF’S

A. RESTIVO, et al., RETALIATION CLAIMS AGAINST

DEFENDANTS LEVAN AND RESTIVO;

Defendants.

PLAINTIFF’S SECTION 1983 MALICIOUS

PROSECUTION CLAIMS AGAINST

DEFENDANTS LEVAN AND RESTIVO;

AND PLAINTIFF’S DEVEREAUX CLAIMS

AGAINST DEFENDANTS LEVAN,

REYNOLDS, AND RESTIVO; AND THAT

ALL OTHER CLAIMS AND

DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED

20 (ECF No. 1)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN

DISTRICT JUDGE Devonte Harris (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.