Unknown

(PC) Nance v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20202:20-cv-00894California1,479 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DELARA LARISHA NANCE, No. 2:20-cv-0894 WBS DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER UNKNOWN, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges they are not receiving medical, dental, or mental health care. Before the court is plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) for screening. For the reasons set forth below, this court finds plaintiff fails to state any cognizable claims for relief. The FAC will be dismissed and plaintiff will be given one, final opportunity to amend the complaint to attempt to state a claim for relief. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed an original complaint on May 1, 2020. On screening, this court found plaintiff failed to state any cognizable claims for relief. Plaintiff was informed that to state a claim, they must: (1) identify a specific person, (2) explain what actions that person took, (3) explain how…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.