Halliday

Halliday v. Spjute

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20201:07-cv-00620California1,715 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHELLY J. IOANE, et al., Case No. 1:07-cv-00620-AWI-EPG

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

Plaintiffs, FOLLOW-UP PSYCHOLOGICAL

EXAMINATION OF PLAINTIFF

v. SHELLY IOANE PURSUANT TO

FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL

JEAN NOLL, et al., PROCEDURE

Defendants. (ECF No. 565)

16 17 Before the Court is Defendant Jean Noll’s motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 18 Procedure 35, for an order compelling a follow-up psychological examination of Plaintiff 19 Shelly Iaone by Defendant’s expert witness Ricardo Winkel, Ph.D. (ECF No. 565). The Court 20 held a hearing on the motion on September 25, 2020. For the reasons set forth below as well as 21 on the record at that hearing, the Court finds good cause for the follow-up psychological 22 examination by Dr. Winkel and will accordingly grant the motion for a second examination 23 (ECF No. 565). The Court will also deny Defendant’s motion to strike the declaration of Dr. 24 Castillo. (ECF No. 573 at 6.) 25 As…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.