Brashear

Brashear v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 20201:20-cv-00505California551 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL BRASHEAR, et al., ) No.: 1:20-cv-0505 -NONE -JLT ) Plaintiffs, ) ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS ) AND RECOMMENDATIONS GRANTING v. ) DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ) ARBITRATION HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC., ) ) (Doc. Nos. 10, 25) Defendant. ) ) )

Plaintiffs Michael Brashear, Benito Contreras, Kenneth Dollar, Terry Foster, and Ricardo Rodriguez seek to hold Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., liable for wage and hour violations under California law. (See Doc. No. 1.) Halliburton asserts that plaintiffs agreed to arbitrate claims arising out of their employment and moved to compel arbitration of all non-PAGA claims presented in the complaint filed in this court. (Doc. No. 10.) Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration was referred to the assigned magistrate judge for the preparation of findings and recommendations. (Doc. No. 16.) The magistrate judge issued finding and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.