(PS) Jones v. Velocity Technology Solutions
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARRISON JONES, No. 2:19-cv-2374-KJM-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER VELOCITY TECHNOLOGY
SOLUTIONS LLC; STEVE KLOEBLEN;
SUSAN HALTOPP; MICHAEL
BALDWIN; SHANA COLEMAN;
VICKIE LEROUX; J.C. ODOM; CHAD CARLSON; and CHRIS HELLER, 17 Defendants.
19 On July 31, and August 14, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendant Velocity Technology Solutions, Inc. (“Velocity”) filed objections on August 14, 2020, which this court has considered. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. ///// This court…