(PS) Jones v. Velocity Technology Solutions

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20202:19-cv-02374California668 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARRISON JONES, No. 2:19-cv-2374-KJM-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER VELOCITY TECHNOLOGY

SOLUTIONS LLC; STEVE KLOEBLEN;

SUSAN HALTOPP; MICHAEL

BALDWIN; SHANA COLEMAN;

VICKIE LEROUX; J.C. ODOM; CHAD CARLSON; and CHRIS HELLER, 17 Defendants.

19 On July 31, and August 14, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendant Velocity Technology Solutions, Inc. (“Velocity”) filed objections on August 14, 2020, which this court has considered. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. ///// This court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.