Espinoza

(HC) Schuster v. Espinoza

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20201:12-cv-01482California802 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARISSA SCHUSTER, Case No. 1:12-cv-01482-AWI-SAB-HC

Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION, DENYING

v. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS, DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

JANEL ESPINOZA, TO CLOSE CASE, AND DECLINING TO

ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF

Respondent. APPEALABILITY

(ECF No. 156)

17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On December 23, 2019,1 the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendation that recommended the first amended petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. (ECF No. 156). This Findings and Recommendation was served on Petitioner and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the Findings and Recommendation. The Court subsequently granted two extensions of time to file objections. (ECF Nos. 157–160). To date, no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.