Naftzger

(PC) Church v. Naftzger

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 20201:17-cv-00596California866 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JACK CHURCH, Case No.: 1:17-cv-00596-AWI-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING

v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

J. NAFTZGER, CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT, AND DENYING MOTION

Defendant. TO STRIKE

(Docs. 43, 48, 53, 55)

16 Plaintiff Jack Church is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. Plaintiff’s sole operative claim is for an alleged procedural due process violation under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 21 at 3.) This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 29, 2019, Defendant J. Naftzger filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 43.) Plaintiff filed an opposition and cross-moved for summary judgment. (Doc. 48.) Plaintiff also filed a motion to strike “Defendant’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.