Scalia

(PC) Johnson v. Scalia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20201:18-cv-00061California1,998 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARL JOHNSON, Case No. 1:18-cv-00061-DAD-JDP Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE GRANTED J. SCALIA, et al., ECF No. 41 Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on plaintiff’s complaint, which alleges a conditions of confinement claim against defendants J. Scalia, A. Fritz, B. Hackworth, A. Aranda, J. Campos, and two Doe defendants, and a claim of deliberate indifference to plaintiff’s serious medical needs against the two Doe defendants. ECF Nos. 1, 17. Defendants have moved for summary judgment on the conditions of confinement claim, seek dismissal of Doe defendants and the medical deliberate indifference claim, and ask for qualified immunity. ECF No. 41. The motion was submitted on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.