(SS) Hayer v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 11 SUKHVINDER SINGH HAYER, Case No. 1:19-cv-00297-EPG Plaintiff, FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER
REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL
v. SECURITY COMPLAINT COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
16 Defendant. 17 18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s complaint for judicial review of an unfavorable decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding his application for Supplemental Security Income. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge for all purposes. (ECF No. 7, 8). At a hearing on July 28, 2020, the Court heard from the parties and, having reviewed the record, administrative transcript, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, finds as follows: I. Medical Opinions Plaintiff claims that the ALJ committed harmful error by giving too little weight to the opinions of three treating physicians: Dr. David Singh, Dr. Bobby Yang, and Dr. Vladimir Royter. physicians: (i) treating physicians, who…