Toor

(PC) Madsen v. Toor

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20201:19-cv-00022California260 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL MADSEN, 1:19-cv-0022 AWI JLT (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION FOR SUBPOENAS

v. (Doc. 18) DR. KIRAN TOOR,

Defendant.

This action is pending on Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Shortly after Defendant filed that motion, Plaintiff moved for subpoenas to depose two nurses who allegedly witnessed Defendant’s conduct underlying Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim. (Doc. 18.) In light of the pending motion to dismiss and the procedural posture of this case, Plaintiff’s motion for a subpoena will be denied as premature. See Smith v. Municipality of Fresno, 1:19-cv-0651-DAD-EPG, 2019 WL 6618059, at *3 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2019) (“If the Court finds cognizable claims in this matter and orders that the case proceed to the discovery stage, the Court will instruct Plaintiff as to how to issue subpoenas.”); Wallace v. Pierce County Sheriff’s Dep’t, 3:19-cv-5329-RBL-DWC, 2019 WL 2141640,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.