Navarro

(PC) Martinez v. Navarro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20201:19-cv-00378California660 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE ANTONIO MARTINEZ, 1:19-cv-00378-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS

vs. ACTION PROCEED ONLY AGAINST

DEFENDANTS SERGEANT M.

M. NAVARRO, et al., NAVARRO, C/O NAVARRO, C/O E.

MARES, AND C/O CRUZ, FOR USE OF

Defendants. EXCESSIVE FORCE UNDER THE

EIGHTH AMENDMENT, AND THAT

ALL OTHER CLAIMS AND

DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 14 DAY

19 I. BACKGROUND Jose Antonio Martinez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 22, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) The Complaint names as defendants Sergeant M. Navarro, Correctional Officer (C/O) Navarro, C/O E. Mares, C/O Cruz, Sergeant Kellog, Sellers (Psych. Tech.), Stamphill (Psych. Tech.), Kenneth Landry (Psych. Tech.),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.