Sexton

(PC) Washington v. Sexton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 20201:18-cv-00513California198 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMIEN WASHINGTON, Case No. 1:18-cv-0513-DAD-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS

TO APPOINT COUNSEL

v. (Docs. 36, 46) M. SEXTON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. However, district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). Only in exceptional circumstances may the court request the voluntary assistance of counsel for appointment. Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). The court does not find the required exceptional circumstances to justify appointment in this case. The Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motions to appoint counsel (Docs. 36, 46).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 14, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.