Salazar
(PC) Bland v. Salazar
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 20201:19-cv-01499California1,037 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 JOSHUA D. BLAND, Case No. 1:19-cv-01499-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE v. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, BECAUSE OF PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE
DOE, TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER
AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE Defendant. (ECF No. 19)
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN DAYS
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN
DISTRICT JUDGE Joshua D. Bland (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 5, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 19). The Court ordered that “[t]his action proceed against defendant Doe on Plaintiff’s claim for violation of his Fourteenth Amendment right to due process.” (Id. at 6). As the only defendant in the case is a Doe…