Salazar

(PC) Bland v. Salazar

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 20201:19-cv-01499California1,037 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 JOSHUA D. BLAND, Case No. 1:19-cv-01499-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE v. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, BECAUSE OF PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE

DOE, TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER

AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE Defendant. (ECF No. 19)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN

DISTRICT JUDGE Joshua D. Bland (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 5, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 19). The Court ordered that “[t]his action proceed against defendant Doe on Plaintiff’s claim for violation of his Fourteenth Amendment right to due process.” (Id. at 6). As the only defendant in the case is a Doe…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.