(PC)Flores

(PC)Flores v. California Correctional Women's Facility

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 20201:19-cv-01509California707 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 ENID MARIE FLORES, CASE NO. 1:19-cv-1509 NONE JLT (PC)

11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL CONSOLIDATE;

WOMEN’S FACILITY, et al.,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

Defendants. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL; AND

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

COMPEL

17 (Docs. 12, 15, 23)

SIXTY-DAY DEADLINE

20 Plaintiff’s complaint was recently screened and found to be devoid of a cognizable claim. (Doc. 21.) She was then directed to file either a first amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified by the Court in the screening order, a notice of voluntary dismissal, or a notice of election to stand on the complaint. In her response to the screening order, Plaintiff indicates her intent to file an amended complaint and seeks an extension of time to do so. (Doc. 23.) Good cause appearing, this request will be granted. Plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.