Martinez-Sanchez
Martinez-Sanchez v. Anthony Vineyards, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SEBASTIANA MARTINEZ-SANCHEZ, et Case No.: 1:19-CV-01404-DAD-JLT al., Plaintiffs, ORDERDENYING STIPULATION TO AMEND
THE CASE SCHEDULE
v. (Doc. 36) ANTHONY VINEYARDS, INC., et al., Defendants.
Counsel have stipulated to amend the case schedule. (Doc. 36). They assert that they have diligently attempted to complete discovery within the current deadlines, but it appears that all that has occurred is that the plaintiffs have propounded written discovery requests. Id. Inexplicably, counsel spent four months meeting-and-conferring over the language of a protective order. Id. Because three months passed after the scheduling conference before the plaintiffs propounded the discovery, the Court is at an absolute loss to understand how counsel believed that could burn up an additional four months of discovery time debating the language of a protective order. When counsel first reported this dispute in July, they had not completed their meet-and- 25 …