Perez

(PC) Gonzalez v. Perez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 20201:19-cv-01447California594 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL HERNANDEZ GONZALEZ, No. 1:19-cv-1447-JLT (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE; v. ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

SUBMIT SERVICE DOCUMENTS; AND

GUARD H. PEREZ, et al.,

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

Defendants.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS NON-COGNIZABLE

CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

19 Plaintiff’s first amended complaint was recently screened and found to state a cognizable 20 Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against Fresno County Jail Officer R. Perez and a failure- 21 to-protect claim against Officer Mrs. Sharp. No other claims were cognizable as pled. Plaintiff was 22 then directed to submit notice as to whether he wished to proceed only on the cognizable claims, 23 whether he wished to dismiss this case, or whether he wished to stand on his pleading. Plaintiff has 24 now filed a notice of his intent to proceed on the first amended complaint as screened. Accordingly, 25 the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.