Vela

Vela v. City of Porterville

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20201:20-cv-01151California976 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ISABEL VALDEZ VELA, No. 1:20-cv-01151-AWI-EPG (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE

WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

v. DISMISSED AS BARRED BY THE

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS

CITY OF PORTERVILLE, et al., (ECF No. 1) Defendants.

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

16 Isabel Valdez Vela (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed the civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 commencing this action on August 17, 2020. The complaint alleges the Defendants violated her Fourth Amendment rights in 2015. Thus, by the face of the complaint, it appears that Plaintiff’s claims are barred by the statute of limitations. Accordingly, the Court will order Plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed as barred by the statute of limitations. I. APPLICABLE LAW “The statute of limitations for section 1983 actions is determined by state law. Section 1983 actions are characterized as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.