Favor VEXATIOUS LITIGANT v. Black Lives Matter

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20201:20-cv-01165California1,398 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 BRANDON ALEXANDER FAVOR, Case No. 1:20-cv-01165-DAD-SKO

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DENY PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO PROCEED

v. IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BLACK LIVES MATTER, et al., (Doc. 3)

Defendants. TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

14 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Brandon Alexander Favor, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil action under 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a) and 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which he filed on August 19, 2020. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (“Section 1915”) on September 10, 2020. (Doc. 3.) Plaintiff’s application should be DENIED for two reasons: (1) his application demonstrates he is not entitled to in forma pauperis status under Section 1915(a); and (2) since he has three strikes under Section 1915(g), his allegations fail to show imminent danger of serious physical injury.

II. PLAINTIFF IS NOT ENTITLED TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

24 UNDER 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.