E.E.

E.E. v. Norris School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20201:20-cv-01291California1,974 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 E.E., a minor, by and through his guardian CASE NO. 1:20-CV-1291 AWI JLT ad litem, LAURA HUTCHINSON- ESCOBEDO; CHRISTOPHER ORDER RE: MOTION FOR ESCOBEDO; and LAURA TEMPORARY RESTAINING ORDER HUTCHINSON-ESCOBEDO

Plaintiffs

v. (Doc. 5) NORRIS SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Defendant

15 I. Background Plaintiff E.E. is 7 years old and has been diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Plaintiffs Laura Hutchinson-Escobedo and Christopher Escobedo (“Parents”) are E.E.’s parents. Plaintiffs live in Bakersfield, CA, within the boundaries of Defendant Norris School District (“NSD”). E.E. started attending kindergarten at Norris Elementary in August 2018. E.E.’s original Individualized Education Plan (“Original IEP”) allowed E.E. to take part in a general education classroom for 98% of the time with 2% of his time spent on speech and language services. The Parents agreed to the Original IEP and it was implemented starting on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.