McCoy

McCoy v. Philadelphia Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 20201:20-cv-01329California698 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

MAURICE MCCOY, )

) Plaintiff, ) Case No.: 2:20-cv-00879-GMN-DJA 5 vs. ) ) ORDER

PHILADELPHIA INSURANCE COMPANY, )

) Defendant. ) 8 ) 9 Pending before the Court is Defendant Philadelphia Insurance Company’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Transfer Venue, (ECF No. 8). Plaintiff Maurice McCoy (“Plaintiff”) did not file a response, and Defendant filed a Notice of Non-Opposition, (ECF No. 10). For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND This case arises from an insurance contract dispute. On March 24, 2020, Plaintiff commenced this action in state court, alleging the following claims against Defendant: (1) breach of contract; (2) contractual breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (3) tortious breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing - bad faith; and (4) insurance unfair…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.