Knipp

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 H. DYMITRI HARASZEWSKI, No. 2:13-cv-2494 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER KNIPP, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff alleges defendants retaliated against him, interfered with his mail, placed him in segregation as a punitive measure, and deprived him of his property. Before the court are plaintiff’s motions to inspect sealed documents, for appointment of an investigator, and for an extension of time. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiff’s motions to inspect documents and for an investigator are denied. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time is granted in part. BACKGROUND This case is proceeding on plaintiff’s third amended complaint. Plaintiff alleges that on November 26, 2011 at Mule Creek State Prison (“MCSP”), he was removed from his cell and a large bag of his papers, books, and photos was confiscated. Plaintiff was then notified…