Calone

Jackson v. Calone

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20202:16-cv-00891California1,242 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOROTHY RODDEN JACKSON, No. 2:16-cv-00891-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER RICHARD CALONE; CALONE &

HARREL LAW GROUP, LLP; CALONE

& BEATTIE, LLP; CALONE LAW

GROUP, LLP,

16 Defendants.

18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Dorothy Rodden Jackson’s (“Plaintiff”) ex parte application for appointment of a guardian ad litem. (ECF No. 229.) Defendants Richard Calone, Calone & Harrel Law Group, LLP, Calone & Beattie, LLP, and Calone Law Group, LLP, (collectively, “Defendants”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 231.) Plaintiff filed a reply. (ECF No. 233.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s application. /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this action on April 28, 2016. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff asserts a variety of claims arising from legal services that Defendant Richard Calone, Plaintiff’s former attorney, provided to her regarding the preparation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.