(PS) Lepp v. Yuba County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 20202:17-cv-01317California546 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 REVEREND HEIDI LEPP, et al., No. 2:17-cv-1317-KJM-EFB PS Plaintiffs, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS YUBA COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 16 This action proceeds on plaintiff’s second amended complaint, which purports to assert numerous federal and state law claims against 14 defendants. ECF No. 62. On March 12, 2019, plaintiffs were ordered to show cause why their claims against defendant Jeffery Reisig should not be dismissed for failure to effect service of process within the time prescribed by Rule 4(m) and/or failure to prosecute their claims against him. ECF No. 136. The court also recommended defendant Yuba-Sutter Narcotic Enforcement Team’s (“Net-5”) default be set aside and plaintiff’s claims against the remaining 12 defendants be dismissed without leave to amend. Id. With respect to Net-5, the court observed that the record reflected that Net-5 is an intergovernmental association and, consequently, plaintiffs were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.