EHealthline.com, Inc. v. Pharmaniaga Berhad
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 E*HEALTHLINE.COM, INC., a Delaware No. 2:18-cv-1069-MCE-EFB corporation, 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. 14 PHARMANIAGA BERHAD, and MODERN INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT
HOLDING GROUP COMPANY
LIMITED, Defendants. 18 This case is before the court on plaintiff’s motion for default judgment against Modern Industrial Investment Holding Group Company Limited (“Modern”). ECF No. 81. For the reasons stated below, it is recommended the motion be denied for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.2 ///// /////
This case was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(19). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
The court determined that oral argument would not materially assist in the resolution of the motion. Accordingly, the matter was ordered submitted on the briefs, ECF No. 88. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). I. Background Plaintiff E*Healthline (“EHL”) filed this action against…