(PC) Eiland v. Sacramento County Main Jail Medical Facility

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20202:18-cv-01042California504 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODNEY CHARLES EILAND, No. 2:18-cv-1042 MCE KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a former county jail inmate,1 proceeding pro se in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff requests that the court appoint counsel. Defendants Tam and Walden oppose the motion. On June 3, 2020, the undersigned recommended that defendants Tam and Walden be granted summary judgment. On August 7, 2020, the district court adopted the findings and recommendations. On August 12, 2020, plaintiff was granted sixty days in which to show cause why the Doe defendants should not be dismissed and this action terminated based on his failure to timely seek leave to amend to add new defendants or to file an amended complaint. //// 26 Plaintiff was housed at the Sacramento County Jail from about February 19, 2016, through late July 2017. (ECF No. 48 at 2.) He filed a change of address on July…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.