Bishay

Bishay v. Icon Aircraft, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 20202:19-cv-00178California2,996 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAMER BISHAY, No. 2:19-cv-00178-KJM-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER ICON AIRCRAFT, INC., Defendant. 16 Defendant Icon Aircraft, Inc. (“ICON”) moves to dismiss plaintiff Samer Bishay's (“Bishay”) Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). Mot., ECF No. 29. Plaintiff opposes. Opp’n, ECF No. 32. Defendant replied. Reply, ECF No. 33. Having read and considered the moving papers, the court GRANTS defendant’s motion. I. BACKGROUND This case concerns a dispute over a transaction between plaintiff and defendant for the purchase of an airplane. This is the third motion to dismiss in the case. The court reviewed the factual background in detail in its order on the first motion to dismiss and incorporates that summary by reference here. See generally Order on First Mot. to Dismiss, ECF No. 18. The court’s order on the second motion to dismiss addressed a clause, which the court refers to here as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.