Constable

(PC) Cyprian v. Constable

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 20202:19-cv-00689California2,950 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 REALIOUS CYPRIAN, No. 2:19-cv-0689 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER T. CONSTABLE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1, 2. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Plaintiff has also requested the appointment of counsel. See ECF No. 1 at 6. For the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted, and plaintiff will be permitted to proceed with the cognizable claims of the complaint. Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of counsel will be denied I. IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See ECF Nos. 2, 6. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.