(PC)Rivera

(PC)Rivera v. Suisun City Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 20202:19-cv-00920California474 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JASON RIVERA, No. 2:19-cv-0920-KJM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SUISUN CITY POLICE DEAPRTMENT, et al., 14 Defendants.

16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The United States Marshal has returned process directed to defendant Maccabe, stating that the defendant cannot be located using the information provided by plaintiff. ECF No. 19. On May 18, 2020, the court instructed plaintiff to provide new information for service of process within 30 days and warned him that failure to do so or show cause for such failure would result in a recommendation that defendant Maccabe – the sole defendant in this case – be dismissed pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures. ECF No. 20; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) (service of process must be effected within 90 days of the filing of the complaint unless plaintiff demonstrates good cause). The time for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.