Morris CM Enterprises, LLC v. Wingstop Franchising LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MORRIS CM ENTERPRISES, LLC, No. 2:19-cv-02306-KJM-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER WINGSTOP FRANCHISING, LLC, Defendant. 16 ___________________________________
WINGSTOP FRANCHISING, LLC,
18 Counterclaimant, 19 v.
MORRIS CM ENTERPRISES, LLC,
21 Counter-Defendant. 22 On June 1, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 38. No objections were filed. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 28 de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the…